{"id":295,"date":"2013-05-04T10:44:00","date_gmt":"2013-05-04T09:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/2013\/05\/04\/a-comparison-between-efficiency-from-traditional-techniques-and-those-derived-from-odds\/"},"modified":"2013-05-04T10:44:00","modified_gmt":"2013-05-04T09:44:00","slug":"a-comparison-between-efficiency-from-traditional-techniques-and-those-derived-from-odds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/2013\/05\/04\/a-comparison-between-efficiency-from-traditional-techniques-and-those-derived-from-odds\/","title":{"rendered":"A comparison between efficiency from traditional techniques and those derived from odds"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

The traditional methodology to calculate the efficiency of decision making units is to estimate a frontier either using non-parametric techniques (e.g., DEA) or parametric techniques (e.g., stochastic frontier models). In order to do this the output and inputs need to be established. If the purpose is to calculate the efficiency of teams\/managers in a sport league there is a consensus to use the number of points or winnings as output and quality measures of the squad as inputs. Once it is estimated the frontier to calculate the efficiency index is straightforward by diving observed output by the frontier output given the inputs. <\/span><\/div>\n
I have recently proposed (<\/span>http:\/\/footballperspectives.org\/ranking-football-managers-big-5-leagues-2011-12-season<\/span><\/a>) an alternative way to calculate the efficiency of managers by using odds. The idea is quite simple, first it has to be computed the probability for the teams of getting a certain amount of points at the end of the league given the odds[1]<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a>, that means that it is calculated the density function of the points at the end of the league. Thereafter, it can be computed the probability of the cumulative distribution function at the actual number of points. In other words, it is computed the probability that a certain team would have done less points. This figure can be interpreted as an efficiency index given that it is bounded between zero and one and that the greater the value the greater the efficiency.<\/span><\/div>\n
Next, I am going to compare the efficiencies that arises from estimating a production frontier for the coaches in the Liga BBVA at the season 2011-2012 (<\/span>http:\/\/footballperspectives.org\/efficiency-managers-spanish-football-league-2011-12-season<\/span><\/a>) and the efficiency of the teams derived from the odds. To estimate the production function it was used as output the ratio between points obtained and the total possible points (i.e., 3 x the number of matches) and as input the value of the most valuable goalkeeper, 6 defenders, 6 defenders, and 3 forwards from<\/span> <\/span>http:\/\/www.transfermarkt.co.uk<\/span><\/a>. <\/span><\/div>\n
Table 1 shows such comparison.<\/span><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
Team<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Squad \u20ac<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Points<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
TE frontier<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Rank frontier<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
TE odds<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Rank odds<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Rank diff.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Levante U.D.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
2.6E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
55<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
100.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
93.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
2<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Real Madrid C.F.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
4.6E+08<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
100<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
100.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
2<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
96.2%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
-1<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
C.A. Osasuna<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
3.0E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
54<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
95.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
3<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
87.9%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
3<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
F.C. Barcelona<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
5.5E+08<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
91<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
88.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
4<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
38.2%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
14<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
10<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
R.C.D. Mallorca<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
4.4E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
51<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
83.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
5<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
85.7%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
4<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
-1<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Real Betis Balonpi\u00e9<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
3.4E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
47<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
81.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
6<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
48.4%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
11<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
5<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Rayo Vallecano<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
2.2E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
43<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
81.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
7<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
47.4%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
12<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
5<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Valencia C.F.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1.3E+08<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
61<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
80.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
8<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
49.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
10<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
2<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
M\u00e1laga C.F.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1.0E+08<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
58<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
79.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
9<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
56.3%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
9<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Getafe C.F.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
5.2E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
47<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
74.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
10<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
59.8%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
8<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
-2<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
R.C.D. Espanyol<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
4.7E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
46<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
74.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
11<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
45.5%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
13<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
2<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Real Sociedad<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
6.0E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
47<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
72.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
12<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
72.3%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
5<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
-7<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Atl\u00e9tico de Madrid<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1.5E+08<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
56<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
70.9%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
13<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
30.8%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
16<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
3<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Real Zaragoza<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
4.4E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
43<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
70.3%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
14<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
63.4%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
7<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
-7<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Granada C.F.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
4.3E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
42<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
68.5%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
15<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
66.8%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
6<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
-9<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Athletic de Bilbao<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1.1E+08<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
49<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
67.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
16<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
26.9%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
17<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Sevilla F.C.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1.2E+08<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
50<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
66.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
17<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
19.4%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
18<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Sporting de Gij\u00f3n<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
3.9E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
36<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
59.9%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
18<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
37.0%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
15<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
-3<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Villarreal C.F.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
1.5E+08<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
41<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
51.9%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
19<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
11.6%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
19<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Racing de Santander<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
2.8E+07<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
27<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
48.4%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
20<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
6.8%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
20<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Mean<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
75.5%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
52.1%<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
SD<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n
0.14<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
<\/td>\n\n
0.26<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Corr TE frontier-squad<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
0.34<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Corr TE odds-squad<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
0.02<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
<\/div>\n
There is one team that is really benefited from obtained the efficiency using the production instead by using the odds methodology, FC Barcelona. Why? To answer this question is worthy to analyze the following picture that helps to explain how it works the production function methodology.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
[1]<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a> In doing so the odds are converted into probabilities and subsequently it is used the formula that tells us that the joint probability of two independent events (e.g., a victory of the same team in two different football matches) equals the product of their probabilities.<\/span> Using this simple formula for all possible combinations of match results of each team, the probability of each team within a league obtaining a certain amount of points can be computed. The total points ranges between zero (i.e., the team loses all matches) and the product of the number of matches and three (i.e., the team wins all matches). In particular, we use the betting odds from CODERE APUESTAS.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The traditional methodology to calculate the efficiency of decision making units is to estimate a frontier either using non-parametric techniques (e.g., DEA) or parametric techniques (e.g., stochastic frontier models). In order to do this the output and inputs need to be established. If the purpose is to calculate the efficiency of teams\/managers in a sport … <\/p>\n

Continuar leyendo \u00abA comparison between efficiency from traditional techniques and those derived from odds\u00bb<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":69,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-295","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sin-categorizar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/69"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=295"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uclm.es\/juliocorral\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}